Saturday, 5 January 2019

Mary Poppins Returns

Sequel? Reboot? A guaranteed nostalgia evoking film

Starring Emily Blunt, Emily Mortimer, Lin Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw and Colin Firth, Mary Poppins Returns acts as part sequel, part reboot and entirely a shootout to its predecessor.

The movie also sees Dick Van Dyke (Bert in the original) and Karen Dotrice (Jane Banks in the original) and Angela Lansbury make special appearances.

Mary Poppins Returns picks up 25 years after the events of Mary Poppins. Set in the 1930's depression London, the dark and gloomy mis en scene serves the purpose of setting the mood of the film as well as the time period post which the snow melts and before the first blooms of spring. All the "too dark" complaints are just preposterous.

The plot centres around the now fully grown Michael Banks and his three children, John, Annabel, Georgie Banks, their aunt Jane Banks and housekeeper Ellen. Michael has to pay off a loan amount in five days time. The Banks are struggling... They need help. Enter Mary Poppins.

She descends from the skies, slides up the banisters and helps the children enter a fantasy world where she plants seeds of ideas in their heads with various fantasy based activities.(No I'm not talking about Inception) She then helps the adults with a little bit of magic.

Children are more likely than adults to engage in escapism- the tendency to seek distraction and relief from unpleasant realities, especially by seeking entertainment or engaging in fantasy.

Are all the escapades in the bath tub and the bowl just Mary Poppins telling the children stories? She is literally asking them "Can You Imagine?"

The children in the film engage in escapism, just like Michael and Jane did as children in the original. But now the parent Michael and aunt Jane dismiss such ideas of escapism. Why? The movie shows the evolution of children into adults.

Does that mean Mary Poppins isn't actually magic and only seeks to help others discover the magic through imagination?

Disney appear to have attempted to rectify the discrepancies between the way they presented Mary Poppins in 1964 to the way the character was presented in P.L.Travers series of novels.

Mary Poppins(Emily Blunt) seems a tad stern from Julie Andrews' version, yet it feels uplifting. She is practically perfect, repeatedly checking out her reflection and refuses to acknowledge the existence of a fantasy world. Her character seems exasperated when asked to join in the dancing and then consenting with a "oh very well."

Her presence on screen seems so reminiscent of Julie Andrews(though not so good, so as to make audiences think that this portrayal was better) as well as the Mary Poppins described to audiences by Emma Thompson's P.L.Travers in the film "Saving Mr. Banks." The rather frightening aspect is left out.

All the precursors point towards Emily Blunt receiving a nomination for The Academy Award for Actress in a Leading Role.

Lin Manuel Miranda's Jack the Lamplighter makes the audiences yearn for and miss Dick Van Dyke's Bert the chimney sweep from the original.

Good editing could have seen a good 25 minutes shorter runtime.

The movie could really have done without one of the songs for after the fourth or fifth musical number it just seems tedious to sit through them.

A really funny criticism of a musical. But neither is the music spectacular nor can one easily summon the lyrics from memory. The songs are good but fall way short when compared to songs from the original. Stuff like, "A spoonful of sugar", "supercalifragilisticexpialidocius", "Chim Chim Cheree" or even "Let's go fly a kite" which are still adored and would be adored had we heard them for the first time today.

To be honest, such songs will always be better than anything new as we have been hearing those songs for years. The songs had soul and meaning and were just delightful, unlike the present day where we are flooded with dozens and dozens of songs and "songs."

In the entire runtime I spotted just two songs that feature dialogue lyrics. One song was part of a completely unnecessary scene the other song "Trip a Little Light Fantastic" (I had to use Google to help me with the name) featured the best choreographed song of the movie. Though honestly based on the pattern of the movie, we could see it coming, the setting, the side characters and the way it would start.

If the songs couldn't have been edited out, then surely the unnecessary scene featuring Cousin Topsy (Meryl Streep) could've been done away with. We don't get any closure from that scene nor is it revisited at a later part in the film or relevant to the films climax. The film would have remained the same had that scene not been there and someone else given the two crucial lines in another scene.

Mary Poppins requires every second Tuesday off yet she was working on the day before the visit to Topsy's which was the second Wednesday. Does Mary Poppins forget to take her holidays?

Disney has yet again refrained from introducing Micahel and Jane's siblings, the twins John and Barbara Banks and their youngest sibling Annabel.

Dick Van Dyke' s cameo appearance is one of the moments of the movie that does not fade away with the end credits like the rest of the film would.

Nostalgia in the form of the almost non existent 2D animation and a few characters and even the progression of the story make the film a must watch for fans of the original. The film is also worth a watch for ones wishing to enjoy a light film with good visuals. Kids below 10 would enjoy it.

The acting performances are good, but the singing isn't on par with the original, but on it's own and watched as a standalone, it is a good movie.

P.S. Please do not watch the original immediately before watching this one as you will struggle to like this film. For it is abundantly clear that the magic of the predecessor cannot be recreated.

Rating: 3/5

Sunday, 30 December 2018

Black Mirror: Bandersnatch

Black Mirror: Bandersnach is the first ever Black Mirror movie and is an interactive film experience which offers everyone their own movie. Stefan has to create a video game called Bandersnatch. That's all that is the same.

The film has a run time ranging from anywhere between 35 to 90 minutes. How it ends is completely dependent on you. You have 'complete control.'

Being a Black Mirror film, Bandersnatch will obviously focus on how behaviour is manipulated by technology and how people's actions and thoughts are shaped by it.

Yes, it is possible to watch Black Mirror:Bandersnatch like a traditional movie where you refrain from making a single choice. So then....

Why do we even make that first choice?

If we don't make it, it will be made for us and we will be controlled.

Just like Netflix offering us the choice of 'Next episode' and 'go back' and making the choice of next episode if we refrain from clicking on either of the options, the movie too choses either of the two options if you do not make a choice within 10 seconds. It's not that the two options will remain there until you decide. So we make a choice to be in control, but....

Are we the ones in control, or, is control an illusion?

The film has certain supposed endings which are actually resets. A reset is when you reach an ending and then are taken back to the place where you made the wrong choice. You are taken back to that place in a manner akin to episodic television's "previously on so and so show" type of way. A fast forward from the start. Till.... That choice confronts you again.

Infinite loops are real until we accept that we are being controlled.

The film shows us again that despite having control, we are controlled. At times (based on the path you chose) Bandersnatch proves to be an infinite loop. I was repeatedly given a choice between the same password or symbol. At times i was faced with two televisions with two choices from the past, one was the previously ignored one and the other was 'go back'. At times I'm told stuff along the lines of "try again" or the usual, "wrong choice." I'm in the loop till I make the choice they want me to make.

It's a restart. Like a video game. Like life. It's up to you. You will be a bit more aware than you were the last time. It'll show. Make the right choice or live with what your choices, till you eventually learn that what you chose was wrong, or, you can go back make the wrong choice again and stay in the loop. You chose wrong and are stuck. In the end you need to choose what they want you to choose. Control is an illusion.

Consuming content or consumed by content?

Ideally the first proper ending (not reset) that a viewer reached which led them to the end credits sequence would be the ending they had chosen out of interest. An actual choice. What if the first ending was the perfect ending (not in the game, but perfect on the basis of how we would control our character). I watched 4 endings. But actually, the first one I saw was the perfect one. The second and the third and all the endings are the result of us wanting to see whether the other choice was better. It was us choosing what we didn't choose earlier.

The show gave me the option of going to the end credits, or go back, and I chose to go back. Black Mirror and Netflix obviously knew I would go back. We think we control Netflix as we can choose what we want to watch, when we want to watch it and how many times we want to watch it. But isn't it actually Netflix that is controlling us and attracting us to them, like how the fly is attracted to the sweet scent of the flytrap only for it to be consumed. We know there are five endings and we are desperate to unlock them all And find out what would have been had we chosen differently. Not only with this. We want to know what happens in that new show or movie as well.
We are consumed by the overload of content.

There is too much content online, some of it not even entertaining

The overload of content on Netflix and other platforms and even TV may have been addressed in the show. Why is everything so ordinary. Shouldn't it be spiced up a bit, isn't that what we would do. Do you imagine yourself in extremely mundane situations and at those times you suddenly transform into something and spice up the moment a bit? Isn't that, what would be considered as entertaining? Don't we watch some show and think, "this is how I would spice it up a bit." Yet you watch what you find uninteresting or you have changed your definition of interesting to fit in things that are called interesting. Why? Again. Netflix wants you to choose to watch it. Netflix wants me to watch Bird Box. I am inundated with posts about that movie on my feed.

Different routes may lead to the same goal


At the start we were unaware of th key choices and did doovers on quite a few of the choices only to go down a different road and reach an ending we had already witnessed.
Every single choice made by every single person is different hence every single outcome experienced by everyone is different. And then there are different routes to reach the same place. Many roads. Audiences the world over would behoove from realising this.

Is insanity the key to success?


Does every artist need to be a damaged and destroyed, non conforming being? Do they have to have some dark secrets for then to succeed. Can't they conform or get cured, or even accept and repent and then achieve success. Is every single artist someone who has a dark past?

What's Good?

Netflix may have found the answer to combat piracy. A new form of storytelling and movie watching had been experimented with. Audiences cannot be unhappy with the ending as every ending they discover is a result of their choices. Subtle commentary about technology and how technology are our masters.

What's Bad?

A film is something where we go and watch what unfolds before us and not something where we make the choices. Movies are usually enjoyed when one can focus or maybe watch it with a snack in one hand and a drink in the other. You make decisions in your daily lives, you decide to switch on your laptop or open your phone and log onto Netflix in either device and then that's not the last decision for the next couple of hours as you have to make decisions throughout the movie itself.

I chose an option, I was taken to an ending. And then I went back to my last choice. I chose the other option. Now that choice has somehow resurrected a character I had chosen to take a leap. How is that possible?

Also a time travelling sequence? Really? Atleast the T.A.R.D.I.S. and the waverider are believable time travel devices. But what was used to time travel in this episode was just weird. This is the storyline i didn't buy into. Atleast they didn't mess around with the laws of time travel from popular time travel shows.

Tolerance level of the audience in desperately searching for commentaries of technology will not mask absurd storylines and will alienate the loyal fanbase.

I felt that making your choice viewing was extremely annoying as the screen just freezes for 10 seconds despite me sometimes making a choice within 5 seconds. And the two choice option box popping up constantly on screen spoils the viewing experience.

Who should watch it?

Watch this movie if you want to literally play a movie. Watch it if you got nothing to watch for the next 5 evenings and wish to watch 5 different movies. All you need to do is remember the choices you make so that you can avoid making them on the next day.
If you think Black Mirror: Bandersnatch is that typical two hour entertaining movie which you can watch,laugh about and forget. You probably should refrain from watching it. Bandersnatch is filmed, edited and presented in a way to make us all paranoid, and to make us think, our choices can end up scarring us as well. 

Rating
Just for the first of its kind new format.
3.5/5 

Saturday, 22 December 2018

Aquaman

Aquaman starring Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, Patrick Wilson, Dolph Lundgren, Nicole Kidman and Willem Dafoe in addition to another actor whose presence shocked me, is the sixth movie of the DCEU.

The movie which "introduces" us to the character Aquaman and his origins, commences with mesmerising quotes about the sea, that shot from the trailer of the lighthouse in the crystal ball (that's all I saw of the trailer, before I would shut my eyes and put in my earphones for 5 minutes so as to not have a single bit of the movie spoilt for me. You can't blame me after Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice) and then follows the journey of Aurthur Curry, a half born Atlantean human who reluctantly journeys to find the Trident and challenge his half brother to become the ruler of Atlantis and unite the two worlds. Am unsure wether I got the order correctly.. But that's about it. No I'm not talking about the plot of multiple Hindi movies or Harry Potter or Thor. This is Aquaman.


The character of Aquaman is shown on screen in a manner that may sway the hard-core comic fans attitudes to the character.

He was seen as the brawny guy with dashes of humour in his previous 2 outings in this character. This film sees him display normal human emotions which convinces audiences about his half human side and what makes him different from his half brother Orm(Patrick Wilson).

A positive for the Aquaman movie is that it has short and crisp fight scenes unlike Superman vs Zod in Man of Steel where the city of Metropolis is completely annihilated and Batman/Superman/Wonder Woman vs Doomsday in Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice which sees large scale destruction.

The short and crisp fight scenes work as the underwater battle scenes leave the audiences attempting to mostly unsuccessfully figure out who is who.

A sincere thanks to the DCEU for refraining from completely decimating the coastal village of Sicily in their only above land fight.

The film has an abundance of fabulous visuals in scenes both above and below the ocean, which will stay with you for long after you have exited the cinema hall.
Atlantis is introduced to viewers with a sudden blast of neon colours reminiscent of the Tree of Souls from Avatar's Pandora, or more closer to real life, Singapore's magnificent Gardens by the Bay. The brilliant blue and the purple throw light into the ocean around it which made me absolutely love the scenes.
The neon hydro cannons and water pulse blasts illuminate the darkness of the depths of the ocean to paint a wonderful picture of the kiss scene on the screen. The film is filled with visually stunning moments in abundance both above and below the sea.

The ocean does seem a tad too dark to view the characters in, and sows a seed in the audiences minds that this is something to tweet about against the DCEU. Mercifully, that seed of an idea for criticism is answered in the movie itself by Willem Dafoe's Vulko which assists the viewer in comprehending the reason and accepting why the amount of light used is perfect.

The magnificence of the costumes is lowered by the dark watery background. When they can be seen clearly is when the action in the film occurs above sea level and those are the times one can appreciate the magnificence and properly fitting costumes. An argument provided here is that James wan should have added more colour to the costumes. The criticisms then would've been that the Atlanteans and inhabitants of the Seven seas were a bunch of sparkling individuals prancing around against a dark aqua background.

The usage of common childhood riddles in the movie as creation of underwater transport for beings that can propel themselves through water at super speeds is very amusing.

The traditionally dark DC comics film have been forced to take a page out of Marvels book and engage in unnecessary humour. There is humour in this film but don't fret, it's much better than Ezra Miller's "Bat Cave" and "Dostoyevsky" from Justice League. But still humour in a superhero film is something that is just out of place for me.

Based on Aquaman's physique and how such characters are portrayed in cinema moviegoers flock cinema halls expecting an abundance of action sequences.
These action scenes in this film draw inspiration or if not they prompt movie buffs to recall similar scenes witnessed in other movies. I recognised scenes such as the Leap of faith from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and battle scenes from The Lord of the Rings Trilogy that have been recreated or been used as inspiration. Game of Thrones' sept of baelor is something else I was reminded of from one fight scene.  Of course we do get that kiss scene (thank you Central Board of Film Certification for cleaning the film without cutting that scene) during a fight where the action is slowed down and all missiles seem to miss the protagnists. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 2?

The film 'Aquaman' connects with the contemporary issues and gives audiences a couple of timely environmental messages.
Inclusivity and acceptance of others as they are, are big words being thrown around this film industry and Aquaman represents how two different worlds can be one or live together.

The character 'Aquaman' was introduced a few movies back and now we get a movie about the origin. The other way round would have been much better. Perhaps with a post credits scene having Batman approach Aquaman with a proposition? Too much of a Marvel Copy? Well post credits scene are a thing now. But, it's good to see DC base it on characters solely from this film rather than rush to connect it to other events and other members of the Justice League. An enjoyable movie for film buffs and due to DC refraining from connecting this film to events of other characters in its shared universe a casual movie watcher can enter the cinema and watch it without feeling lost.

We have Julie Andrews in the film. Did you know that of you didn't read the cast prior to entering the cinema. I didn't.

Having watched this film in India it is obvious that the Central Board of Film Certification will order censor cuts. The censor work was shoddy and quite amusing.
Based on the subtitling the word Buster was muted out and the lip movement seemed to indicate that the antagonist was uttering the word Bastard. Buster is Bastard, eh. Slow clap. Illegitimate son sees the word illegitimate muted out, but they leave it on the screen in the subtitles (which are of course enhanced by the 3D) Ah yes. Reading the word won't have as much effect in horrifying the audiences as much as it wouldve had it been uttered. Son of a gun muted out once more? But we read this as well. I counted seven instances where the words are muted. Maybe the people who order outings should go out and observe the ones for whom the censor the films. Y'all aren't protecting them from anything.

Sunday, 18 November 2018

Fantastic beasts 2: The Crimes of Grindelwald


Fantastic beasts 2: The Crimes of Grindelwald is the 10th movie set in the Harry Potter universe and the second Fantastic Beasts movie. It takes place about six months after the events of Fantastic Beasts and where to find them. 

What's good?
The movie does not have 3D release which is good. Firstly, because Potterverse films don't really need 3D to enhance them. Secondly, the last 2 movies ('Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2' and 'Fantastic Beasts and where to find them' didn't work in 3D) and thirdly, the lack of 3D was good as this gives audiences one less element to criticise.
The re appearance of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry for barely a few minutes, will evoke a feeling of nostalgia among Potterheads. Jude Law as Albus Dumbledore and Johnny Depp as Gellert Grindelwald put in good performances, but they don't come face to face. The makers are obviously saving it for the final installment of the spin off prequel series which will see the legendary duel between the two, take place. (I hope Newt or some fantastic beast doesn't make an appearance in that duel to keep with the fantastic beasts theme and it being Newt's story. Which is an argument given regarding the title and the central character(s) or a lack of it?)

What's bad?

The lack of a central character.

Arguments could be made that a slew of appearances by magical creatures and their master Newt makes Newt the central character but, how does that make this film any different from the first installment where we actually dealt and were introduced to multiple Fantastic beasts.
Add 'The Crimes of Grindelwald.' The movie does actually introduce Grindelwald properly and shows him amassing followers and holding gatherings. He is being chased by the aurors for crimes he committed in Europe prior to the first instalment. In this writers opinion Grindelwald does not commit any crimes (plural) in this film.

The Harry Potter movies too barely featured the Order of the Phoenix in the 5th movie?

They got away with this in the Harry Potter series as each film was based on the books (and had to be named as such) which featured Harry Potter (and friends as the central characters) and whatever in great detail. Even if the movies didn't.

Misleading title

Here the titling of the movie just seems off. The words 'Fantastic Beasts' should be omitted, as it is the name of one of the background reading books at Hogwarts and unlike the first film here there is no story of the fantastic beasts being found or described about. Yes they’ve thrown in the Zoulu(for what exactly?) and the Maledictus.
The Bowtruckle description does bring a smile to fans who have read the books. But what else? It just exists in the movie to validate the title. By all means continue Newt's story. But don't name the movie Fantastic Beasts: Crimes of Grindelwald. The name ‘Crimes of Grindelwald’ with a little more focus on the Dark wizard would have been good.

The building up of a movie franchise without giving the viewers something to enjoy in this installment of the franchise.

In this era of streaming services, the audiences are familiar with slow build up as they know that they will be able to watch the episodes that really matter within a few hours. So the lackluster middle episodes don't really matter. In the movies we know that there are going to be three more Fantastic Beasts films. And maybe the 5th one will be the franchise redeemer. But are we supposed to just while away our time till approximately 2024?

The original 8 Harry Potter movies were spread out over a period of 11 years. All  8 movies had a proper ending for audiences to take home after viewing each installment.

Excessive retconning by J.K. Rowling.

She claims to have been sitting upon the piece of information regarding the Maledictus for 20 years. Really? Did she know 20 years back that the series would still be running and be so popular? Or that there would be social media where she could retcon the series at will and thwart the fandoms comprehension? The changing of timelines and family trees is annoying.
She has also tried to fuel her Twitter reveals through subtle hints in certain scenes. You didn't think she wasn't gonna do that, did you?

Who should watch it?

Being a movie set in the Harry Potter Universe it will undoubtedly have good costumes (the previous installment triumphed Oscar for costumes in 2017), visual effects etc.
This movie is for those who love good visual effects. Potterheads will watch it out of loyalty. (They should avoid it too, for it may possibly drive them to abandon the universe they held so dear for over a decade) I have decided to reread the seven books and watch the seven movies and ignore everything (sequels and prequels) after that. Kind of like how some Star Wars fans ignore the existence of the prequel trilogy.

Tuesday, 9 January 2018

Pad Man Trailer: Akshay Kumar is India’s newest superhero


Pad Man is inspired by the life and work of Padmashri Arunachalam Muruganantham, who revolutionised the ease of access of affordable sanitary pads across the country.

 The trailer of Akshay Kumar starrer Pad Man was released on 15th December on social media. 
The 2.22 minute trailer shows a journey of the protagonist, who has a unique idea, who starts off from a small place, is ostracized in his attempts, and succeeds in the end just like a superhero. This helps in justifying the opening line of the trailer….

“America ke paas Superman hai, Batman hai, Spiderman hai... lekin India ke paas PadMan hai!”
The lead character of the film is positioned as a superhero, akin to the giants of the DC and Marvel Cinematic Universes.

Super heroes are ones who make another person’s life better. The capes, masks and costumes aren’t a requirement. A superhero can be anyone, even a man who manufactures affordable sanitary pads.
 Here the villain is the taboo on menstruation and those who promote its taboo. 

The Khiladi of Bollywood seems to have struck a chord with audiences in films creating awareness on social issues. After the success of 'Toilet: Ek Prem Katha' which created awareness about the issue of open defecation, His next film, 'Padman' will aim to create awareness and normalise the discussion around menstrual hygiene and in doing so eradicate the taboo of menstruation hygiene that exists in parts of India.

18 years into the 21st century there have been attempts to break the stigma around periods, but it still exists. Films like Phullu (2017) have attempted to create awareness about menstruation in the form of films, but haven’t gotten the widespread attention that a film starring an A-lister like Akshay Kumar would. Hence the name Akshay Kumar is a major factor behind the trailer topping the list of trending videos on YouTube with 20,548,710 views in 48 hours.

Akshay Kumar in an interview said he believes that movies can be a powerful way to turn the tide on taboos.

"I didn't want to make a documentary," he said. "I wanted to make a commercial film so people can see it. It's a film you can take your children to, even though it talks about sanitary pads. It's a universal subject. Nobody has ever tried to touch this subject."

“The movie should enable audiences to start a discussion on women mensuration hygiene, a topic still considered taboo in many parts of the country.”

Directed by R. Balki and starring Radhika Apte and Sonam Kapoor in supporting roles with Amitabh Bachchan in a special appearance, Pad Man releases in cinemas on 25th January, 2018.

Saturday, 4 November 2017

The Amazing Race

18 October

My eyes opened suddenly. I felt mentally awake and decided to get to the remote. I raised myself onto my elbows and felt a sharp pain sear right up to my shoulders. My ribs stung me. My body just wanted to fall back flat onto the mattress. It was to be expected though. I don't really engage in such strenuous activities on a regular basis.

Upon reaching home after the race I calculated the distance our team had covered (8.267 km) and I weighed myself. It showed 58.7 KG. I was 60.2 KG in the morning when I left for the race.

To move was difficult as the body had stiffened up. Walking from the bedroom to the kitchen was a struggle. I tried to remember when exactly I had tweaked my ankle, couldn’t think clearly, needed ice.

I didn't feel like eating.  Water or juice was all I craved for. Why did I sign up for this? The shoulders, calves, knee, quadriceps, temples, ribs, spine were all reminding me of my exertions in the morning.

It was the IC Youth Fest and the first event was The Amazing Race. I've watched the show of the same name on TV and have always imagined myself in such a race. 

We didn't know how long the race would be in terms of distance and time. All we knew was that it would be long and it would be tiring. It would drain us physically and mentally. 
This was the only event of the Youth Fest that I was competing in.

The stops were scattered to avoid large queues at all the stops. We were timed at every location. The app would record the time at which we solved the riddle to our first location and then we would be timed whenever we solved the next riddle. The questions prior to every riddle contained 300 points for answers in 1st attempt and 200 in 2nd and 100 in 3rd and final attempt. Also at each stop our arrival time as well as our task completion time was noted. Maybe this was to help the teams that get delayed while waiting for their turn in case 2-3 teams reached the stop at the same time. The points and the times would be looked at and the winners would be announced the next day as this event isn’t like the Amazing Race we see on TV where all teams have tasks in the same order and have a common finish point. We couldn’t control the tasks beforehand, all we could do is walk fast and have a lower time. In the event of glitches, the organisers at the stop would note the time the task was completed to the time the team was able to solve the next riddle and continue on with the race.

Sitting on my bed and icing my knee I remembered the final task…

The Graveyard

This was the simplest task. We had to walk in the IC Church graveyard and find a particular grave and report the grave number to the task in charge. Simple. As we were 10 of us and we could divide the place amongst ourselves and search. The task was done in under a minute and the app told us that we were done. The brutal journey was over. I wanted to just sit down over there itself. No! Sitting there would only prolong my wait to get the rest my body was desiring. Now as I walked home, I noticed a limp, a pain in the ribs, and a feeling of dizziness. It was a quarter to two. 210 minutes back at 10:15 AM, when we were much fresher we had set off from the Church and headed to…

Cupcake Affair

I wasn't even aware of such a place. The riddle spoke about bite sized cakes. We entered the location in the app. Location confirmed. A glance around the church courtyard told me that many other teams were still figuring out their first clue. We quickly set off to the first location. The race had 20+ teams and we knew that all the teams would not be sent to the first location at the same time, but some of them would be, we had to reach first or else we would have to wait. The delayed start made us eager to set off as we wanted to move fast before the sun got higher and it became hotter. 
We reached the place and saw a table set on the footpath. There was a bucket of water net to it. We were first team to reach and could start the task (drop a 10 rupee coin into a glass kept inside a bucket of water) immediately.

Simple? No. The coin had to be held at waist high and had to be dropped perfectly into the water. It took us about 5 minutes to do it. I struggled here and was the 2nd last to finish. Upon completion of the task we got a question and upon answering it we got our next riddle. Our next stop was 2 km away at …..

Concessao Ground

Along the way to Concessao ground we passed a few of our competitors. I could see it in their eyes, they were tired. We put in effort in our walking so as to get into their heads a bit. I did it with the aim of getting them to go faster than they would and drain out their reserves. They did go faster :)

At Concessao, a hula hoop was placed on the floor, 2 metres away from a device that served as a slingshot. We had to fold papers and shoot them into the hoop. Easy task? Nope. The angle, pullback, wind currents etc. had to be taken into consideration. Also the psychological pressure of the race and physical exhaustion of walking over 2 km were factors. Would we be thinking clearly and focus on the task, or in the aim of finishing it just continue firing the paper aimlessly and wasting time with tired efforts?

3 papers had to fall into the hoop. Once a player shot a paper into the hoop they would be ineligible to try again. I waited a while whilst my team mates went 2 or 3 times (getting 1 paper into the hoop) and then having figured out a perfect angle, I fired a paper into the hoop on my first attempt. We got our next riddle which was surprisingly easy, but the journey… was not. We had another 2 km walk to……

Zen Garden

Taking all known shortcuts we reached Zen. I was getting a shoe bite. We saw 2 other teams approaching Zen and we ran so as to reach first and avoid waiting in a queue. The running left me panting heavily, but as all 10 of us reached, we beat out 2 other teams that were sprinting as well and they had to wait till we were done. I was struggling with a very simple task that required us to place a straw between our lips and transfer peas from one bowl to another. I feel I got an assist in that task, did I transfer 5 peas? Maybe. I remember doing 4 but I was really out of breath. I trust our officials, I’m sure they were competent and would have spotted a cheat attempt.

Psychologically I received a boost as after failing miserably in the task I overheard the other teams discussing where all they had been and overheard a 3rd team say their riddle out aloud. Those guys still had to visit Concessao. They still had to walk 2 km and they would be doing it under the harsh 11 30 AM sun. That energised me temporarily. We figured out that our next location was the ZOIC Pet Park (more commonly known as Dog Park)

Dog Park

This walk was relatively shorter and seemed like nothing after back to back 2 km walks. 
Our task here was to crawl and eat a biscuit from a string held by 2 volunteers. The catch was that all 10 had to do it without breaking the string. If the string broke the task would be restarted. We couldn't afford a restart. Upon completion we received our next riddle and found that our next task would be in our backyard of Holy Cross 1. Also the 450 M distance meant that we could run all the way there.

Slope

Our task here was to roll a tyre through two plastic chairs kept at a particular distance. Again, easy to think, but rolling that tyre on our uneven Indian roads meant that the tyre was constantly veering left and right. The app had a glitch here and all the three answers were wrong. We had to take an enforced pit stop (the time which would be deducted from our race time) This break gave me crucial rest time. It was now 12:10 PM. At 12: 45 we resumed the race and headed off to….

Mother Teresa Garden

After icing my knee I proceeded to the ankle, it was during the flat out sprint to the Mother Teresa Garden where I felt a slight tweak in my ankle. Possibly that extended break had caused my body to cool off and me trying to go at the speed I was prior to the break was not what the body needed, but it was crucial for the race.

I wasn't able to even properly participate in the next task (spoon in mouth and pass a marble to the next spoon without it falling. The task would be complete once the marble had been passed that way across all 10 players) dropped the marble but successfully managed to pass it to the next player with my hand due to some sort of distraction.

With every step I took a painful sensation was shooting up my leg right to my lower back. My brain was protesting at every step. It would have been kinder to quit and head off home. I didn't do it though, as this was the only event I was competing. I decided that I would give this my all and hold nothing back. After all, I would have the entire vacation to recover. Our next location was nearby though. That was another factor in me continuing on to the….

Crasto busses lane

The task here was that 5 people had to lift a potato with their legs, bunny hop 4 feet and drop it in another basket. This task was done quickly and we got our next clue after yet another glitch in the app (this time the glitch was solved in 5 minutes as we weren’t the first team to face it)

Our next location was….

Francis Ground

Back to almost where the race flagged off, we reached there fast, it felt as though we had hitched a ride there. Maybe a last push as we knew the end (an assumption as we had been to all the corners of our colony) was near masked the pain and just drove me to find that extra effort. Here we had to balance a ball on two ropes and roll it along the ropes, and drop it into a bucket. Crucially again, we were here first among the teams who had the Francis ground as their next stop. The game was paused as the organisers had their hands full with rectifying the glitches. Upon restart we were the first team to attempt that task before heading off to The Graveyard.

For someone who doesn't engage in such physical activities.
I had doubts about keeping up as it had been 5 and a half years since I quit tennis, and the team of 10 had college level footballers and basketballers. People who are active. My lifestyle is one of binging shows all day eating chips and my only activities are walking to and from college and running for a train and climbing the stairs in the college building.  
I considered completion of the race as an achievement.

19th October

It was the evening entertainment session of the IC Youth Fest. I went to church as I had told a friend that I would be coming after I missed the singing event the day before. To walk or even stand was a challenge, still, I decided to attend. It took me 20 minutes to walk from my place to the church. Usually that walk takes 5-10 minutes. The place was stacked with chairs and the youth were standing and enjoying the jive session from the corner. A few of us friends decided to get into the Pope Paul Hall as we wanted to get away from the sound. I heard the Amazing Race Winners being announced but didn't feel like I had the energy to go to the stage. Every step was a reminder of my exertion the day before. I pretended that I hadn't heard the announcement so that it would seem that I missed it rather than I couldn't climb the steps. I did go back out and stand where my team members saw me and gave me my medal.

This was the first time that I had received a medal for winning something, I’d mostly gotten certificates and coffee mugs for previous wins. The ribbon around my neck, weighed down by a shiny piece of metal did reduce the pain. I had seen athletes bite their medals at the Olympic Prize ceremonies and I tried it out myself. The cold, hard gold coin between my teeth made me smile despite everything. We had won and I was a part of the team.
The event according to me is one of speed (obviously as it is a race) and team work, there will be some moments where 1 or 2 out of the 10 may not be able to keep up, some people would be able to perform particular tasks faster and help.

The teams needed to have individuals who would constantly motivate their team mates and provide encouragement. We had that.
It is about commitment, as unless there was a serious injury, if we showed up at a task with less than 10 members we would receive a points penalty. It was important that we drag ourselves as we had voluntarily chosen to be a part of this event.

22nd October

4 days after the race, I finally was able to walk without pain shooting up my leg. I had a meal of rice on the 20th for dinner. It had just been juice, water and chips from the 18th afternoon to the 20th.

It was a test of my willpower, a test of endurance and it when I recount this story in person to anyone and they ask me what for. I can proudly display my gold medal....or a picture of it.


Tuesday, 3 October 2017

ICE CRISIS: MELTING OF ICE GLACIERS

This was the research essay I submitted for the CIA 1&2 for the course on Contemporary Issues. I got 35/40 for this. 

(I was motivated to take this topic as this event occurred right as we were told to select our topics. I was also keen on this topic as i had picked up the National Geographic Magazine Issue in July and the cover issue was Secret Report: Antarctica which focused on how speed of melting of glaciers in the continent of Antarctica has increased and could result in rise of sea-levels.)

ICE CRISIS: MELTING OF ICE GLACIERS
                                                -Reubyn Coutinho


INTRODUCTION
No place on Earth compares to the vast white wilderness of forces of snow, ice, water and rock. Antarctica is simply stunning. (1) Antarctica is the 5th largest contingent on the planet earth, twice the size of the island of Australia. With an average elevation of 2.5 km, it is the highest continent and with an average temperature of -50 degrees, it is the coldest continent. The continent is 99% ice and is home to 90% of the world’s ice in an area just one and half times the size of the United States of America. It has a two mile thickness of ice on an average. (2)
70% of the planets freshwater is in the continent of Antarctica in the form of ice. Despite this, the continent of Antarctica is classified as a desert region (specifically an arctic desert) due to the fact that it receives less than 6.5 inches of rainfall annually. (3)
Antarctica can be divided into two parts. They are West Antarctica and East Antarctica. The mountain range known as the Transantarctic Mountains divides the desert continent of Antarctica into West and East. (4) East Antarctica is the larger half of the continent. It is considerably larger than West Antarctica. The ice sheet covering East Antarctica has a thickness of five km in some regions. (4)
The East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) is more stable than the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) as a bulk of the ice sheet rests on bedrock high above current sea level.  (5)
The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is mostly grounded below sea level. As most of this Ice Sheet lies below sea level it is a Marine Ice Sheet. West Antarctica is the largest Marine Ice Sheet on Earth. Being a marine Ice Sheet it is capable of rapid change and therefore could be unstable.(23)
Ice is constantly on the move at Antarctica. It moves faster at the Ice Shelves and Glaciers.
The ice shelves are a thick, floating platform of ice that forms where a glacier or ice sheet flows down to a coastline and onto the ocean surface, typically in Antarctica or Greenland.(6) They are akin to floating dams. They act as barriers which prevent inland glaciers and Ice Sheets from slipping into the sea. (7)
Ice Shelves floating in the water

 The ice shelves are already floating in the water, hence they don’t add much to the sea level. But as they weaken and split away to form Ice Bergs, the glaciers behind them retreat as ice rapidly flow into the sea. (8)
Picture a dam, and imagine what happens if they dam breaks or is opened. The commodity beyond just flows.
"Although floating ice shelves have only a modest impact on of sea-level rise, ice from Antarctica's interior can discharge into the ocean when they collapse. Consequently we will see increase in the ice-sheet contribution to global sea-level rise.
Dr Hilmar Gudmundsson, British Antarctic Survey (9)
According to Helen Fricker of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, the ice shelves – are the canary in the coal mine. She adds that when an ice shelf melts sea level doesn’t rise but it’s like a signal that a rise is imminent, as glaciers behind the shelf will accelerate.
A study published in The Cryosphere showed signs of an initial crack in Larsen C in 2010. The crack’s developments were tracked closely over the next few years by scientists. The crack’s growth began speeding up in 2014. NASA’s operation Ice Bridge in late 2016, captured a photo of the rift which now measured 113 km long and 91 m wide. In June the Antarctic Research group Project MIDAS showed that 5 km of ice was all that held the ice shelf to the continent. (13)
The Pine Island Ice Shelf has a thickness of 1,300 feet over most of its area. It has thinned by an average of 150 feet over the last two decades from 1994 to 2012. Pine Island Ice Shelf are shredded by rifts a quarter mile across (16)
This essay will look at the recent event of Larsen Ice Shelf C splitting away, ice shelves of the Amundsen Sea Glaciers, Larsen Ice Shelf A, vulnerable glaciers of East Antarctica.
Secondary data from websites and magazine and newspaper articles will be used in the essay.

MAIN BODY
Floating Ice Shelves of which West Antarctic is the largest, buttress coastal glaciers and the inland ice behind them. As mentioned above, when ice shelves break up to form ice bergs, the glaciers and land ice become a part of the sea much faster.

STABLE
The ocean’s force on an ice shelf and the friction from the bedrock of the continent keeps the glacier in place.

BREAKING APART
Ice Shelves break as warm air and sea water melt it. The glacier’s flow could get lubricated by the melted ice draining to its base.

ACCELERATING LOSS
The glacier loses mass, causing the slopes to grow even steeper. This hastens the flow of glaciers into the ocean.

ERODING FROM THE BOTTOM
Warm Currents pushing under ice shelves are eating away at the Totten Glacier in East Antarctica and the Amuldsen glaciers in West Antarctica. As the Glaciers retreat down these slopes, they may pass a point of no return.

ANCHORED GLACIERS
These glaciers sit in marine basins and are pinned at the grounding line to a seafloor ridge.

RETREATING GLACIERS
Warm currents push back the grounding line, detach the ice and speed it’s flow and retreat.


A large movement of water in one direction is a current. Currents can be temporary or long-lasting; they can be near the surface or in the deep ocean. The largest currents shape the Earth’s global climate patterns (and even local weather conditions) by moving heat around the world. (10)
The Pine Island Ice Shelf is warmed from below by Circumpolar Deep Water, which has resulted in system imbalances, more intense melting, glacier acceleration and drainage basin drawdown. This is the so called “Weak Underbelly” of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, which may be prone to collapse. Pine Island Glacier is thinning, and, combined with rapid basal melting of the Amundsen Sea ice shelves, means that there is concern for the future viability of its fringing ice shelves (11)
Strong winds on the East Antarctic generate waves which circle the continent at approximately 700 kmph. These waves are generated 6000 km away from the Marine Ice Sheet of West Antarctica and when they meet the steep underwater structures of this region, they push the warm water under the ice shelves. This helps explain the high melt rate in the region which leads to parts of trillion tonne ice shelves (Larsen C) to partly break away from the continent.
The warm Antarctic Circumpolar Current passes quite close to the continental shelf in this region, providing a source for this warm water.
According to Dr Paul Spence from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, it is the combination of available warm water offshore and its transportation to the shelves that has seen rapid melting of Ice Shelves along West Antarctica for many years. (12)
“That remote winds on the opposite side of Antarctica can cause such a substantial subsurface warming is a worrying aspect of the circulation at the Antarctic margin."
The worrying aspect of circulation at the Antarctic margin is that faraway winds on the opposite side of Antarctica can cause massive subsurface warming.
The changes in the Antarctic coastal winds, particularly along East Antarctica, might themselves be related to climate change. This is because as Earth gets hotter the strong westerly winds associated with storms over the Southern Ocean contract toward the poles and in turn changing the winds near the Antarctic continent. (12)
When the researchers modelled the impacts of these altered winds on Antarctica they found that they could drive warming of up to 1°C of the waters at the depth of floating ice shelves along the Western Antarctica Peninsula.
This could have significant implications for Antarctica's ice shelves and ice sheets. Previous research showing that even small increases in ocean temperatures can substantially increase melt rates around the Peninsula. (12)

LARSEN ICE SHELF C
On 12th July, 2017 a part of Larsen Ice Shelf C broke away from the highly vulnerable Antarctic Peninsula located in Western Antarctica. The Larsen Ice Shelf is made up of a series of smaller Ice Shelves identified by alphabets from A to G. Larsen Ice Shelf C follows Larsen Ice Shelf A which broke away in 1995 and Larsen ice Shelf B which broke away in 2002. The Larsen C Ice Shelf is the fourth largest Ice Shelf in Antarctica and is larger than Larsen Ice Shelves A and B.
The Ice Berg which broke away has been equated to about a quarter of the size of Wales, or four times as big as London (9) twice the size of Luxembourg (14)

After the ice berg, which has been christened as A68, detached and floated away. Dr Anna Hogg, an ESA Research Fellow in the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling (CPOM) from the University of Leeds and Dr Hilmar Gudmundsson, from the British Antarctic Survey have tracked the iceberg A68 - using the European Space Agency (ESA) and European Commission's Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellite. (15) The Antarctic report tweeted that the iceberg will be the third largest since satellite tracking began.
The gap between the Larsen Ice Shelf C and the Ice Berg A68 is now 5 km wide and increasing by the minute. (15)
 11 smaller ice bergs have been formed. The largest of these 11 is a 13 km long berg. These bits have broken off from Ice Berg A68 as well as from Larsen ice Shelf C which is still attached to the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet, which can be termed as collateral damage. It measures 200 m thick and its depth below sea level could reach 210 m, according to the European Space Agency (ESA). (13)
This calving left the Larsen C Ice Shelf about 12% smaller in area and at its lowest known extent. (14)
Dr Anna Hogg has gone on to say that it looks like the Larsen C Story may not be over yet as satellite images are showing continued action on the Larsen C Ice Shelf. The cracks are growing towards a feature known as the Bawden Ice Rise. The ice rise provides structural support for the remaining ice shelf. In the event of an Ice Shelf losing contact with the ice rise(it could happen here) due to a large ice berg calving event (A68 has been calved from Larsen C) there can be a massive increase in ice speed, and may even result in further destabilisation. (15). If the entire Larsen C disintegrates, it is estimated to increase sea water levels by 10 cm.
MIDAS had reported on their website that glacial flow in the Antarctic Peninsula had tripled in speed, resulting in high-record flow. According to MIDAS, it’s not man- made climate change, but natural causes are the reason behind the calving. (13)
Ice that Larsen C had lost cannot be entirely blamed on warming air temperatures. Two other factors are linked to the loss of ice. (13)
First is the loss of air in its snow covering, called firn. Tiny pockets of air in the firn act as an insulator for the ice sheet beneath. As the firn melts, it loses this air. The resulting meltwater ponds and the absorption of heat and sunlight drive further melting.(13)
The second factor is the melting of its mass from below. The ice melts as it is exposed to warmer waters of the Weddell Sea from south-east Argentina (the closest continental mass near Antarctica). Like Larsen B before its collapse in 2002, Larsen C is experiencing sinking of the shelf because of the ice loss phenomenon. (13)
Lastly, scientists suggested that as the firn melts, the water fills the surface cracks and acts as a wedge, opening the ice sheets further. (13)

LARSEN  A
Hernan De Angelis, a scientist with the Glaciology Division of the Instituto Antartico Argentino in Buenos Aires and his colleague Pedro Skvarca discovered that when Larsen A Ice Shelf disintegrated in January 1995, the glaciers behind it surged towards the sea. It was this discovery that presented positive evidence that glacial surges are hot on the heels of an ice shelf collapse. Scientists revived a discarded theory that ice shelves act as dams that prevent glaciers from slipping into the sea. (7)
De Angelis and Skvarca found that five of the six major streams of ice that fed into the northern section of the Larsen Ice Shelf dramatically surged towards the sea and then retreated in the years following the 1995 disintegration of the shelf.
Their evidence is in the form of blocks of ice in several locations that are stranded 20 to 40 metres above glacier surfaces. Ice terraces are formed when a glacier suddenly lowers as a result of a surge. De Angelis has said that maps of glaciers in March 2002, have shown a retreat in their surge. This is an indication that glaciers have dumped much of their ice into the seas. (7)
The Pine Island Glacier and the Thwaites Glacier are major causes for concern. They are the most rapidly draining glaciers in West Antarctica.

PINE ISLAND GLACIER
The Pine Island Glacier of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet like the Ice Shelf, has thinned and it’s melting has speeded up in recent years. (17)
In 2015 and 2016, a 225 square mile chunk of the Pine Island Ice Shelf broke away and floated away into the Amundsen Sea. This Ice Shelf acts as a dam to the Pine Island Glacier, one of several large glaciers (along with the Thwaites Glacier, the Pope Glacier and the Smith Glacier) that together drain a large dome of ice called the West Antarctic Ice Sheet into the Amundsen Sea. This Ice Sheet has a thickness of approximately two and a half miles and covers an area twice the size of Texas. It rests atop a series of islands, however most of it is on the floor of a basin 5000 feet below sea level.(8)
In March 1994, a U.S. icebreaker ship called Nathaniel B. Palmer reached the Palm Island Ice Shelf. It was able to spend just 12 hours there before sea ice forced it back. In those 12 hours the crew discovered a current just below the ice shelf. This current was slightly less salty than the sea water around it. Why? This water was freshened by melted ice (Antarctica is home to Freshwater). Beneath this less salty layer of water, at a depth of approximately 2,000 to 5,000 feet warmer seawater was streaming along a sea floor canyon. The sea Floor canyon ran parallel under the ice.(8)
The ice was fresh as it originated as snow falling on West Antarctica.
Stan Jacobs, an oceanographer - Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in New York, quickly understood what was going on. The warm water was arriving at Antarctica’s Amundsen Sea from the Pacific Ocean more than 200 miles north. As it was heavy with salt it sunk below the lighter melted freshwater of less salt content and followed the floor of the submarine canyon. This submarine canyon sloped down to the glacier. (8)
The warm ocean water was being channelled under the Pine Island Ice Shelf. This water was ultimately finding the grounding line. The warm water was hitting the wall of ice and eroding it. This was producing the stream of melt laden seawater with less salt content. Due to it being cooler and fresher it had less density.
Now that same canyon was channelling warm ocean water under the Pine Island Ice Shelf. Somewhere tens of miles inland, the warm water was finding the “grounding line”: the place where the glacier lifts off the seafloor and becomes a floating ice shelf. Hitting that wall of ice, the warm water was eroding it, producing a steady stream of melt-laden seawater. Because it was cooler and fresher, it was less dense, and so it was rising above the warmer, incoming water and flowing back out to sea just under the shelf.
As Pine Island Ice Shelf and Pine Island Glacier have a base at the bottom of the ocean due to West Antarctica being a marine ice sheet, they are vulnerable to the gradually warming ocean. In the event of all this ice cracking and drifting away from the continent the warm sea water will cause the grounding line to retreat and the glacier will thin and its melting will speed up. Sea levels would rise by 10 feet which would see coasts around the world get submerged. (8)
 The anchored glaciers will begin retreating, the warm seawater below the shelf will cause the grounding line to retreat and the ice to flow away faster. (18)
In January 2009, the Palmer found that the melt rate had increased by about 50 percent. As the Pine Island Ice Shelf has weakened and the glacier behind it has accelerated, the ice has stretched and thinned for 150 miles inland from the coast. These destabilizing effects spread farther into West Antarctica every year.(8)

THWAITES GLACIER
The Thwaites glacier is worrisome as it could destabilize the entire Marine Ice sheet that is West Antarctica, were it to collapse. This glacier by itself could raise global sea level by about four feet.(8)
Dr Rignot is a glaciologist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Pasadena, California. He has been a principal investigator on several NASA-funded projects to study the mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets using radar interferometry combined with other methods; the interactions of ice shelves with the ocean; and the dynamic retreat of Patagonian glaciers. He is a member of the American Geophysical Union, and the International Glaciological Society. (19)
According to Eric Rignot, these are the fastest melting glaciers on Earth (8)

EAST ANTARCTICA
This is the bigger part of the continent which due to its base and setting on high ground was considered secure.
However despite it being stated in the Introduction that the east is safe, mapping with ice-penetrating radar has revealed a low-lying region cut by glacially carved channels that drop as far as 8,500 feet below sea level. This is perfect for guiding warm ocean water deep into the heart of the ice sheet. The Totten Glacier is the largest coastal outlet in this region.
Melting Antarctica's ice sheets would raise oceans around the world by 200 to 210 feet. (60 to 65 meters)

TOTTEN GLACIER
The Totten Ice Glacier according to Dr Rignot is one Ice Glacier in the East that if it were to collapse would contribute a sea level rise of 13 feet. 13 feet is just a fraction of the rise in sea level that would occur in the event of the Entire East Antarctic Ice Sheet melting. This 13 feet is equivalent to the sea rise that would occur in the event of West Antarctica melting completely.
 “One glacier alone, roughly as much as all of West Antarctica,” says Eric Rignot.
The Totten Ice Glacier is losing two cubic miles of ice per year. In Antarctic terms and in comparison to the ice lost in Western Antarctica on the Antarctic Peninsula and the Amundsen Sea Glaciers, this can be considered a fraction of a loss. Small Potatoes in Antarctic terms.(8)
21 years after Palmer’s voyage to Pine Island an Australian Icebreaker Aurora Australis reached the front to Totten an just like Palmer at Pine Island this icebreaker detected warm water flowing under the ice shelf at a speed of 4.5 cubic miles per day. (8)
Donald Blakenship of the University of Texas has undertaken surveys which have identified two seafloor grooves which are deep enough so as to permit warm water to creep below the Totten Ice Shelf.(the same thing that is happening to the Pine Island Ice Shelf)
The particular type of warm water near Totten Glacier is saltier (therefore denser), so it remains at depth, filling canyons in the seafloor. Seafloor valleys connecting this deep warm water to the coast can especially compromise glaciers, a process previously known to be occurring along the coast of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. (8)
According to a Nature Geoscience paper authored by Jamin Greenbaum and an international team of collaborators in March, 2015.
Warm ocean water has been observed since 1996, below 400 to 500m of cool surface.
Using airborne gravity and magnetics, Greenbaum revealed two deep seafloor valleys that could allow the warm ocean water to reach the base of the glacier’s floating section and drive rapid melt. The discovery likely explains the glacier’s extreme thinning and raises concerns about how it will impact sea level rise. The result is of global importance because the ice flowing through Totten Glacier alone is sufficient to raise global sea level by at least 13 feet. (20)

ANIMALS
"The sea temperature is going up in a way that wasn't predicted and this makes me more worried for the marine animals. The evidence we've got and the models we've been looking at said sea temperature was not likely to change much in the Antarctic. A one degree increase puts us into the region where the animals are pushed to one end of their biological, physiological and ecological capabilities."
-              Lloyd Peck, Marine Biologist, British Antarctic Survey.
The rising temperature of Oceans result in melting and we think that sea levels will rise and low lying regions will be flooded. But they also affect animals of this region. These animals are sensitive to a minimal shift in temperature.
Increase in temperatures and losses of sea ice could spell big problems for krill. Studies show that krill numbers had fallen by 80% since the 1970s. Experts linked its collapse to shrinking sea ice. This endangers the Adelie Penguin which live on the Krill. Krill find food and shelter on the undersides of ice sheets which are retreating thus causing krill population to drop. Penguins are having to expend excessive energy to find food, which makes them less successful at breeding and raising young.

CONCLUSION
Some say that the sea level will rise by 216 feet, some say 189 feet. The bottom line is that ice melting is contributing to a rise in the sea levels. How does that affect us? We will lose our land masses as the sea water will submerge our homes.
Former U.S.President Barack Obama in Before the Flood states that the Pentagon doesn’t label this as an Environmental issue but as a national security issue. This is because people from coastal regions will begin to migrate.
“If they start moving, then you start seeing, um, scarce resources. The subject of competition between populations.”
It is proved that melting is happening faster as the years go by. The melting at Pine Island ice Shelf has increased by 50%. The National Geographic documentary ‘Before the Flood’ states that sailing across the North Pole could be a reality soon. It won’t happen with the South Pole as that is located of the continental mass of East Antarctica.
South America is one of the closest land masses to the vulnerable West Antarctica Ice Sheet. The National Geographic article, ‘What the World Would Look Like if All the Ice Melted,’ says that the Amazon Basin and Paraguay River Basin would be converted into Atlantic inlets. This would wipe out Buenos Aires and coastal part of the country of Uruguay. (24) In North America the entire Atlantic sea board would be submerged. California’s hills would become a cluster of Islands. (24) Closer to home in Mumbai, we saw how much just under 300mm of rain disrupted life. Ice Melting would result in a massive high tide that would flood the city.
A United Nations report published prior to U.N. Environment Assembly estimated that nearly 40 million Indians will be at risk from rising sea levels come the year 2050. People in Mumbai and Kolkata are in risk of maximum exposure to this issue. (26)
This report also listed Guangzhou along with Shanghai from China, Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh, Hai Phong, Yangon and Dhaka as those which are projected to have largest population exposure to coastal flooding in 2070. (25)
Redrawing the world’s map may be a necessary option if the ice were to melt. It won’t happen for hundreds of years, but we are the generation that knows about it, we know the challenge and its up to us to answer it. In the words of Leonardo Dicaprio at the United Nations in 2014. “The time to answer the greatest challenge of our existence on this planet is now. You can make history or be vilified by it.” (27)

WORKS CITED
1. http://www.lonelyplanet.com/antarctica-1007062/introduction
2. https://www.livescience.com/21677-antarctica-facts.html
3. http://www.whatarethe7continents.com/facts-about-antarctica/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/icebridge/2014/11/19/east-and-west-the-geography-of-antarctica/
5. http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/antarctica/east-antarctic-ice-sheet/
6. https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/ice_shelf.html
7. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0306_030306_glaciersurge.html
8. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/07/antarctica-sea-level-rise-climate-change/
9. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/larsen-c-ice-shelf-iceberg-huge-record-antarctic-climate-change-global-warming-a7873411.html
10. http://ocean.si.edu/ocean-news/currents-waves-and-tides-ocean-motion
11.  http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/ice-ocean-interactions/marine-ice-sheets/
12. http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/strong-winds-in-eastern-antarctica-melting-ice-on-opposite-side-117071800326_1.html
13. https://observer.news/featured/ice-land-need-know-a68-iceberg/
14. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/02/what-happened-next-to-the-giant-larsen-c-iceberg
15. https://phys.org/news/2017-08-larsen-c-iceberg-breakaway.html
16. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/07/antarctica-sea-level-rise-climate-change/
17.  https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a004100/a004103/index.html
18. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=82392
19. https://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/environment/sealevel_rignot_bio.html
20. http://www.earthexplorer.com/2015/Southern_Surveys_Unravelling_the_mystery_of_East_Antarctica.asp
21. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/11/01/can-we-stop-the-seas-from-rising-yes-but-less-than-you-think/
22. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/08/19/coastal-cities-at-highest-risk-floods
23. http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/antarctica/west-antarctic-ice-sheet/
24. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2013/09/rising-seas-ice-melt-new-shoreline-maps/
25. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/global-warming/40-million-Indians-at-risk-from-rising-sea-levels-UN-report/articleshow/52358198.cms
26. http://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/india-will-be-in-trouble-if-breakaway-antarctica-iceberg-leads-to-sea-level-rise/story-QbzYQ2PUh98a3vhJqQAZsI.html

27.  https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/leonardo-dicaprio-quotes-on-climate-change-environ/